I have so much information to add about judicial corruption. Some of my real life stories will be posted out of sequential order as some of the stories are already written and others have yet to be written. This story is about:
SILVER SPRING POLICE DEPARTMENT'S SARGEANT HIPPENSTEEL USING FAKE, PREFABRICATED, EVIDENCE AND HOW MY PUBLIC DEFENDER LINDA HOLLINGER AND JUDGE SKIP EBERT OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT HOUSE TRIED TO RAILROAD ME INTO A MENTAL INSTITUTION BY FALSELY CLAIMING I WAS "INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL."
I was renting the top floor of this crazy acting landlady's home. Long story short, she was accusing me of leaving her door open and draining all the oil from her oil tank. That couldn't have been accomplished even if I left all the windows and doors open over night! Cuckoo, cuckoo! She crazily called the Silver Spring Township police several times on me.
I had begun to video tape myself as I was leaving her house as I was afraid of being physically assaulted by her. She had mental issues and was abusing opioids.
On these videos, which I still have, I have evidence of what her back door, wall and framework looked like. It looked like it had been broken numerous times in the past by someone that maybe locked themselves out, like HER!
The one day, while she was gone, I video taped myself from the inside opening and closing the door to prove that it was NOT staying shut as I could open it using just one finger tip. I did that several times then stepped outside and slammed the door shut and then cursed! The door stayed shut and locked!!!
I was in my bathrobe and slippers and had to walk to the neighbor across the street to borrow a butter knife to jimmy the door open. There was NO PREMEDITATION as Sgt. Hippensteel FALSELY accused me of.
When I gingerly tried to jimmy the lock to open, I accidentally cracked her dried out door jamb, (she uses wood to heat the house making everything dry and brittle) which was the extent of the damage I did. Pictures are posted below. This only required to have a couple screws removed, replace the old door jamb which was as wide and thick as a yard stick but much taller, a hole to be bored and the jamb to be put back with the screws. $10 materials and maybe $40 fee for a handyman to do. I was willing to pay for this.
I testified to all of this and showed Hippensteel the video at the police station. The POS then turned around and HAD to have talked the crazy acting landlady into getting an estimate to $1,500 of damage, that was high enough to turn the charge into a criminal charge that would have put me in prison for 2 years!!! Even after I told this POS Hippensteel that the estimate this POS landlady got was NOT conducted by the agency that signed it as I talked to the man and he said that she filled it out and sent it to him for his signature! I told Hippensteel that all the damage she documented on HER estimate which SHE drafted herself was old, PRE-EXISTING damages from over the years before I ever moved in there! He didn't care. He and the DA were trying to gang stalk me with false charges, along with my corrupt public defender Linda Hollinger and corrupt judge Skip Ebert!
Hollinger refused to allow me to audio record my DJ hearing, which I had a legal right to, which then forced me to wave it as there would be no record of this crazy acting landlady's testimony.
Thereafter, Hollinger refused to talk to me and was playing games. Then I find out she filed paperwork making a FALSE accusation that I was Incompetent to Stand Trial.
This was done because they didn't want me to be held in prison for two years. Noooo, the implication of incompetency would have put me in a MENTAL INSTITUTION FOR TWO YEARS where they would have made sure I was put on drugs like Haloperidol to make me lose my mind!
The rest of the story of how I handed them their asses is below. The case was Nolle Pros'd.
Regardless, this is the type of judicial gang stalking I've had to endure repeatedly which at this point has my nerves frayed and my health diminished.
CLICK HERE: TO READ WHAT THE LEGAL STANDARDS ARE FOR DETERMING COMPETENCY AND CONDUCTING SUCH A HEARING, BOTH OF WHICH THESE POSs VIOLATED!
I'LL ADD MORE TO THESE REAL LIFE STORIES, BUT FAST FORWARDING...
I WAS CLEARLY NOT INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL AS I MET NONE OF THE CRITERIA UNDER PA LAW, WHICH I MADE THESE DISGUSTINGLY VILE INDIVIDUALS AWARE OF BUT THEY STILL PROCEEDED, PURPOSEFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY IGNORING LAWS. ONLY THING THAT STOPPED THEM FROM CARRYING THEIR HEINOUS ACT OUT WAS THE FACT I CARBON COPIED MY EMAILS, LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND APPEALS TO REPORTERS AND PSYCH ADVOCATES AND THEY KNEW THEY WERE UNDER PUBLIC SCRUTINY. THEY STILL ACTED ILLEGALLY BY FORCING AN ILLEGAL PSYCH EVALUATION ON ME, BUT THEN NOLLE PROS'D THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE.
ON A SIDE NOTE, ABOUT THE SAME TIME HIPPENSTEELE WAS WORKING WITH DA FREED TO PUT ME AWAY WITH FALSE CHARGES FOR 2 YEARS, MEMBERS OF HIS OWN POLICE FORCE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST HIM THROUGH THEIR UNION FOR INNAPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, WHILE FREED REPRESENTED HIPPENSTEEL, AGAINST THE POLICE.
NEWSPAPER REPORTER MEGAN TRIMBLE WROTE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE DA'S AND SGT.'S BEHAVIOR AND CALLED IT "CLANDESTINE JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR" HOWEVER, I BELIEVE THAT TITLE HAS SINCE THEN BEEN RENAMED TO:
'Selfish, egotistical, narcissistic' sergeant should be removed: Officers' open letter
Updated: May. 14, 2015
By Megan Trimble
The letter, which PennLive received Thursday morning, Hippensteel "has been involved in numerous incidents that demonstrate negligent and unethical behavior" and refers to five specific instances.
The examples, according to the letter, showed the sergeant has an inappropriate relationship with board members and speak to Hippensteel's thriving "on behind-the-scenes, clandestine and underhanded measures in order to gain unearned and undeserved promotions."
SILVER SPRING POLICE DEPARTMENT'S SARGEANT HIPPENSTEEL USING FAKE, PREFABRICATED, EVIDENCE AND HOW MY PUBLIC DEFENDER LINDA HOLLINGER AND JUDGE SKIP EBERT OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY COURT HOUSE TRIED TO RAILROAD ME INTO A MENTAL INSTITUTION BY FALSELY CLAIMING I WAS "INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL."
I was renting the top floor of this crazy acting landlady's home. Long story short, she was accusing me of leaving her door open and draining all the oil from her oil tank. That couldn't have been accomplished even if I left all the windows and doors open over night! Cuckoo, cuckoo! She crazily called the Silver Spring Township police several times on me.
I had begun to video tape myself as I was leaving her house as I was afraid of being physically assaulted by her. She had mental issues and was abusing opioids.
On these videos, which I still have, I have evidence of what her back door, wall and framework looked like. It looked like it had been broken numerous times in the past by someone that maybe locked themselves out, like HER!
The one day, while she was gone, I video taped myself from the inside opening and closing the door to prove that it was NOT staying shut as I could open it using just one finger tip. I did that several times then stepped outside and slammed the door shut and then cursed! The door stayed shut and locked!!!
I was in my bathrobe and slippers and had to walk to the neighbor across the street to borrow a butter knife to jimmy the door open. There was NO PREMEDITATION as Sgt. Hippensteel FALSELY accused me of.
When I gingerly tried to jimmy the lock to open, I accidentally cracked her dried out door jamb, (she uses wood to heat the house making everything dry and brittle) which was the extent of the damage I did. Pictures are posted below. This only required to have a couple screws removed, replace the old door jamb which was as wide and thick as a yard stick but much taller, a hole to be bored and the jamb to be put back with the screws. $10 materials and maybe $40 fee for a handyman to do. I was willing to pay for this.
I testified to all of this and showed Hippensteel the video at the police station. The POS then turned around and HAD to have talked the crazy acting landlady into getting an estimate to $1,500 of damage, that was high enough to turn the charge into a criminal charge that would have put me in prison for 2 years!!! Even after I told this POS Hippensteel that the estimate this POS landlady got was NOT conducted by the agency that signed it as I talked to the man and he said that she filled it out and sent it to him for his signature! I told Hippensteel that all the damage she documented on HER estimate which SHE drafted herself was old, PRE-EXISTING damages from over the years before I ever moved in there! He didn't care. He and the DA were trying to gang stalk me with false charges, along with my corrupt public defender Linda Hollinger and corrupt judge Skip Ebert!
Hollinger refused to allow me to audio record my DJ hearing, which I had a legal right to, which then forced me to wave it as there would be no record of this crazy acting landlady's testimony.
Thereafter, Hollinger refused to talk to me and was playing games. Then I find out she filed paperwork making a FALSE accusation that I was Incompetent to Stand Trial.
This was done because they didn't want me to be held in prison for two years. Noooo, the implication of incompetency would have put me in a MENTAL INSTITUTION FOR TWO YEARS where they would have made sure I was put on drugs like Haloperidol to make me lose my mind!
The rest of the story of how I handed them their asses is below. The case was Nolle Pros'd.
Regardless, this is the type of judicial gang stalking I've had to endure repeatedly which at this point has my nerves frayed and my health diminished.
CLICK HERE: TO READ WHAT THE LEGAL STANDARDS ARE FOR DETERMING COMPETENCY AND CONDUCTING SUCH A HEARING, BOTH OF WHICH THESE POSs VIOLATED!
I'LL ADD MORE TO THESE REAL LIFE STORIES, BUT FAST FORWARDING...
I WAS CLEARLY NOT INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL AS I MET NONE OF THE CRITERIA UNDER PA LAW, WHICH I MADE THESE DISGUSTINGLY VILE INDIVIDUALS AWARE OF BUT THEY STILL PROCEEDED, PURPOSEFULLY AND MALICIOUSLY IGNORING LAWS. ONLY THING THAT STOPPED THEM FROM CARRYING THEIR HEINOUS ACT OUT WAS THE FACT I CARBON COPIED MY EMAILS, LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND APPEALS TO REPORTERS AND PSYCH ADVOCATES AND THEY KNEW THEY WERE UNDER PUBLIC SCRUTINY. THEY STILL ACTED ILLEGALLY BY FORCING AN ILLEGAL PSYCH EVALUATION ON ME, BUT THEN NOLLE PROS'D THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE.
ON A SIDE NOTE, ABOUT THE SAME TIME HIPPENSTEELE WAS WORKING WITH DA FREED TO PUT ME AWAY WITH FALSE CHARGES FOR 2 YEARS, MEMBERS OF HIS OWN POLICE FORCE FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST HIM THROUGH THEIR UNION FOR INNAPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR, WHILE FREED REPRESENTED HIPPENSTEEL, AGAINST THE POLICE.
NEWSPAPER REPORTER MEGAN TRIMBLE WROTE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE DA'S AND SGT.'S BEHAVIOR AND CALLED IT "CLANDESTINE JUDICIAL BEHAVIOR" HOWEVER, I BELIEVE THAT TITLE HAS SINCE THEN BEEN RENAMED TO:
'Selfish, egotistical, narcissistic' sergeant should be removed: Officers' open letter
Updated: May. 14, 2015
By Megan Trimble
The letter, which PennLive received Thursday morning, Hippensteel "has been involved in numerous incidents that demonstrate negligent and unethical behavior" and refers to five specific instances.
The examples, according to the letter, showed the sergeant has an inappropriate relationship with board members and speak to Hippensteel's thriving "on behind-the-scenes, clandestine and underhanded measures in order to gain unearned and undeserved promotions."
July 08, 2015. My public defender refused to allow me to audio record the District Magistrate's Hearing which by law I'm allowed to do. She insisted that only she could record but that I could take notes. I was forced to waive my right to a Preliminary Hearing because I needed to have my own copy of the proceedings as I was sure we'd be able to get the landlady in several lies on cross examination. Because I've been screwed by the CCCH Public Defenders and Judges in the past, I did not trust the PD to be the keeper of the audio files and I had already caught her in two lies before the trial started.
First off...please overlook my infuriated scribbling. This form was late, inappropriate and I've been getting a run around and I snapped. I'm usually calm and have beautiful penmanship. This was NOT a Waiver of Arraignment form. This was an Acknowledgement of Arraignment and Public Defender Appointment Pursuant to Cumberland County Local Rule 303-2.
At the top of this form I wrote "This form was mailed late and none of these matters were discussed nor do I understand what it entails"
I was expected to initial that:
(1) I have been informed of the charges against me. (I got a citation...that's NOT being informed of the charges as a PD is REQUIRED to do). I wrote "I have received a citation from SS Police and not discussed anything with my PD)
(2) My attorney has received a copy of the information and I have waived reading of the same. (I wrote "I have no idea or what waiving entails.")
(3) I have been informed that I have not more than;(a) 7 days after the arraignment...(b) 14 days after the arraignment...(c) 30 days after the arraignment...
(I wrote "I have not been informed, I have not talked to any lawyer about any of this or of evidence I have or that I want a jury trial or about anything the DA has as evidence to dispute it. My PD Linda was made aware I have evidence (which was not discussed) & I want a jury trial when at DJ office. I am not being advised or informed by CCCH PD! Signed October 06, 2015 I also wrote "Also I told PD Linda I can not do morning hearings as per a doctor letter Mr. Buel has."Hollinger stated I could arrive at 12:30pm on Dec 02 and at 1pm on Dec 14 so I changed the dates and times on this inappropriate and ridiculousl form to reflect what she stated.
A few days later Hollinger called and asked if I sent this. I told her that I couldn't initial this forms false statements and that I had crossed out things and put my own words in. I expressed my concern over the wording of the sentences and the time frame as it was WELL AFTER THE ARRAIGNMENT DATE!!!
She stated that THERE WAS NO ARRAIGNMENT DATE and that the Arraignment Date STARTS when I sign the form and I was to MAIL IT IN!!! I mailed it in.
Update: January 06, 2016 I paid the Clerk of Courts $16.00 for copies my PD should have sent me. In these documents, I discovered a letter dated September 18, 2015 from the Clerk of Courts informing the PD to send the form and have me sign it BEFORE THE ARRAIGNMENT DATE which was scheduled for September 24, 2015. I called the PD's office on the 23rd to express concern that I had no Waiver of Arraignment form and was worried that I'd have to drive to court in a vehicle that could break down. I was told the DA knows the form was sent late and not to show up and sign it at my convenience. The letter from my PD with the form was dated September 21st but not in my PO Box on the 23rd, less than 18 hours from scheduled arraignment hearing.
At the top of this form I wrote "This form was mailed late and none of these matters were discussed nor do I understand what it entails"
I was expected to initial that:
(1) I have been informed of the charges against me. (I got a citation...that's NOT being informed of the charges as a PD is REQUIRED to do). I wrote "I have received a citation from SS Police and not discussed anything with my PD)
(2) My attorney has received a copy of the information and I have waived reading of the same. (I wrote "I have no idea or what waiving entails.")
(3) I have been informed that I have not more than;(a) 7 days after the arraignment...(b) 14 days after the arraignment...(c) 30 days after the arraignment...
(I wrote "I have not been informed, I have not talked to any lawyer about any of this or of evidence I have or that I want a jury trial or about anything the DA has as evidence to dispute it. My PD Linda was made aware I have evidence (which was not discussed) & I want a jury trial when at DJ office. I am not being advised or informed by CCCH PD! Signed October 06, 2015 I also wrote "Also I told PD Linda I can not do morning hearings as per a doctor letter Mr. Buel has."Hollinger stated I could arrive at 12:30pm on Dec 02 and at 1pm on Dec 14 so I changed the dates and times on this inappropriate and ridiculousl form to reflect what she stated.
A few days later Hollinger called and asked if I sent this. I told her that I couldn't initial this forms false statements and that I had crossed out things and put my own words in. I expressed my concern over the wording of the sentences and the time frame as it was WELL AFTER THE ARRAIGNMENT DATE!!!
She stated that THERE WAS NO ARRAIGNMENT DATE and that the Arraignment Date STARTS when I sign the form and I was to MAIL IT IN!!! I mailed it in.
Update: January 06, 2016 I paid the Clerk of Courts $16.00 for copies my PD should have sent me. In these documents, I discovered a letter dated September 18, 2015 from the Clerk of Courts informing the PD to send the form and have me sign it BEFORE THE ARRAIGNMENT DATE which was scheduled for September 24, 2015. I called the PD's office on the 23rd to express concern that I had no Waiver of Arraignment form and was worried that I'd have to drive to court in a vehicle that could break down. I was told the DA knows the form was sent late and not to show up and sign it at my convenience. The letter from my PD with the form was dated September 21st but not in my PO Box on the 23rd, less than 18 hours from scheduled arraignment hearing.
THIS IS THE FORM THE CLERK OF COURTS REFUSED TO CLOCK IN ON FRIDAY JANUARY 08, 2016 AFTER MY PUBLIC DEFENDER FILED A COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL MOTION AGAINST ME MAKING HER ACTING AS MY ATTORNEY AS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO THE BOTTOM TO READ THE EMAIL I SENT SEVERAL OFFICES IN THE COURT HOUSE WHICH MADE THEM DO AN ABOUT FACE AND FILED THE DOCUMENT. EVEN THOUGH I CLEARLY ARTICULATED MY WISHES OF HAVING THE MENTAL HEALTH LAWS APPLIED TO THIS PORTION OF THE CASE...THEY BLEW IT OFF!!! STORY AND AN APPEAL BELOW THE EMAIL...
THIS IS THE EMAIL I SENT TO THE HEAD PUBLIC DEFENDER MICHAEL HALKIAS, CLERK OF COURTS MR. LEBO AND COURT ADMINISTRAITOR AFTER I WAS DENIED FILING AN OBJECTION TO COMPETENCY EVALUATION THAT MY PUBLIC DEFENDER LINDA S. HALINGER FILED STATING I'M INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL BECAUSE I'M NOT ASSISTING HER. THE WOMAN CONTINUOUSLY REFUSED TO HANDLE MY CASE OR SPEAK TO ME ABOUT MY CASE. I DID NOT GET THE BARE MINIMUM OF ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. FRAUD ON COURT
2/16/2016 Attn: Halkias, Lebo, Calvanelli concerning Eva Ordonez
From:
EO <[email protected]>
To:
publicdefender <[email protected]>; clerkofcourts <[email protected]>; courtadmin <[email protected]>; news <[email protected]>; DKirkerMorgan <[email protected]>; lukeroman <[email protected]>; mtrimble <[email protected]>; psychcrime <[email protected]>; susana <[email protected]>; tbonner <[email protected]>; dkiner <[email protected]>
Subject:
Attn: Halkias, Lebo, Calvanelli concerning Eva Ordonez
Date:
Mon, Jan 11, 2016 4:36 am
Friday, January 08, 2016 at approximately 4:15pm I tried to file an "Objection to Competency to Stand Trial" document with the Clerk of Courts and was not permitted to.
I was told that I have a public defender and only she could file things on my behalf. Preventing me from filing was a violation of my rights under the Mental Health Procedures Act, 50 P. S. § 7402 (d).
7402. Incompetence to proceed on criminal charges and lack of criminal responsibility as defense
(d) Hearing; When Required.--The court, either on application or on its own motion, may order an incompetency examination at any stage in the proceedings and may do so without a hearing unless the examination is objected to by the person charged with a crime or by his counsel.
My counsel Linda S. Hollinger filed for the competency evaluation and it would be inconceivable for the very same counsel to file for an "objection to the competency evaluation" therefore I had a legal right to file the objection with the Clerk of Courts.
After being wrongly denied filing of said document I spoke with Chief Public Defender Michael Halikis and gave him a copy of the objection and told him what happened and asked him to make sure the objection gets filed as I'm entitled to a hearing by law if I object to the competence evaluation.
I request this matter above be looked into immediately please as the competency evaluation is scheduled for this Thursday, January 14th. At this point the competency evaluation must be put on hold until after this hearing is scheduled and held as I've objected.
Please call after 1pm to let me know when this hearing will be scheduled and let me know if the competency evaluation has been put on hold because I exerted my right to a hearing to show good cause why I'm not the incompetent one but that Hollinger is incompetent and negligent.
I respectfully request this hearing be scheduled after 1pm as I have PTSD and horrible nightmares which your judicial system exacerbates making it very hard for me to fall asleep and when I finally do I have nightmares that are traumatic. Depending on how bad my rest/sleep is I might not be able to wake up and fear I'll miss the trial or not be in a proper state of mind due to sleep deprivation & traumatizing nightmares that takes me at least 2 hours to get over the panic and fear they invoke.
Please accommodate my request to schedule any and all hearings, trials, appointments, etc. after 1pm due to this often times disabling condition. This condition can not be construed as rendering me "incompetent" to stand trial but I respectfully point out that it does require that you accommodate my disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
If after the hearing I am for some malicious or unfathomable reason deemed to need a competency evaluation I will need a competent attorney to represent me at the competency evaluation as I'm entitled by law to have a lawyer present throughout the evaluation and I will invoke that right.
Mental Health Procedures Act, 50 P. S. § 7402
(3) The person shall be entitled to have counsel present with him.
When I spoke to Mr. Halikis I expressed that my PD Linda S. Hollinger has not been doing her job and is trying to falsely make me out as incompetent. I stated I wanted another attorney.
I will be filing charges of my public defender being ineffective and requesting a hearing on this so I can get another attorney to represent me. They can not be Arla Waller or John Shugars either.
I am in need of representation for this bogus criminal charge that is retaliatory in nature. I have witnesses, video footage of how the $2-10.00 door jamb got split without malice or intent as required by law and high quality photographs of the damage which any handyman can repair for less than $50.00. I used a butter knife borrowed from a neighbor (witness) that saw I was dressed in a bathrobe and slippers...no premeditation as required by law. I did not use a battering ram, the landlady Roberta Dyarman has mental issues and falsified the estimate that she made up herself and mailed to the estimator. They did not come out! I also have video from "This Old House" with Bob Villa stating how simple and cheap the repair is with video footage of replacing a door jamb! Original complaint is of a door jamb which then diabolically evolved into the door, door frame, bricks, plaster, etc. The Silver Spring Police did not investigate as I asked them to and have no Prima Facia case. I very briefly mentioned the above to Hollinger because she was too busy to handle my case and she said she'd call to set up an appointment. This was stated at the Preliminary Hearing 8 months ago which I was forced to waive because of Hollinger's actions.
I've called the public defenders office at least 3 times requesting a meeting while complaining about how things are not being carried out as they should be by law. I was always told by the receptionist or Hollinger she's too busy and the hearing's been rescheduled. The hearings were NEVER rescheduled because I was NOT ready as I recently saw noted in one of the motions Hollinger filed. She lied. I also have not been getting copies of motions or discovery or hearing cancellations in a timely manner. Everything's been sent untimely late. Hollinger is botching up my case. She should have filed a motion to dismiss as there's no prima facia case and she should have subpoenaed witnesses. She didn't even handle the Arraignment Acknowledgement properly and she absolutely did not explain anything about it as required by law!!! The form was sent after the arraignment date which she lied and told me there was no arraignment date. I argued that there was. She kept lying that there wasn't. Stating some false story about how the form was the hearing and that I just had to mail it in. Even Mr. Lebo wrote her a letter to send the Arraignment form BEFORE the hearing date but she didn't mail it until after the Arraignment hearing! This form by law has to be explained to me infront of the Clerk of Courts who was to then witness our signatures. This never happened either. I'm not a lawyer. Hollinger has a duty to inform me of my rights. She never did and when I protest as I did on the Arraignment Acknowledgement form she tries to make ME out as incompetent???
This last minute, incompetent, malicious, libelous type of behavior has been keeping me unnecessarily stressed out. I will be requesting a hearing on her ineffective assistance of counsel.
I am requesting competent counsel for the objection to the competency evaluation hearing. I have all my documents, evidence, photographs, list of witness names ready to present. I just don't know how exculpatory, discovery or subpoenaeing works and was relying on Hollinger to do that for me PLUS IT NEVER WAS EXPLAINED! After that, I was even ready to fire her during trial if she didn't defend me properly and represent myself before jurors. I have several case laws to prove me innocent of any criminal intent which is required for this case to stand up with the jurors. I've been studying those laws while waiting for Hollinger to start behaving like a court appointed attorney and help with the rest of my case that I haven't had time to fry my brains over. This is all too much for a traumatised rape victim to handle without the assistance of a public defender that's sworn to uphold the law and help those in need. Instead I'm being railroaded like countless others. You guys should be ashamed of yourselves for trying to climb over client's carcasses so you can win the contest pool of having processed the most amount of victims through your system without giving them due process. That's not being a lawyer. That's parasitic.
I'm not the one holding up this trial Hollinger is.
Lastly, if for some malicious or unfathomable reason I would be deemed incompetent to stand trial by this Department of Welfare's psychiatrist, by law I'm entitled to a second evaluation using a psychiatrist of MY choice which the Dept. of Welfare would be obligated to pay for. I will file a motion requesting Stefan P. Kruszewski, M.D. He's got a great reputation for not being a corrupt psychiatrist.
7402. Incompetence to proceed on criminal charges and lack of criminal responsibility as defense
(f) Experts.--The court may allow a psychiatrist retained by the defendant and a psychiatrist retained by the Commonwealth to witness and participate in the examination. Whenever a defendant who is financially unable to retain such expert has a substantial objection to the conclusions reached by the court-appointed psychiatrist, the court shall allow reasonable compensation for the employment of a psychiatrist of his selection, which amount shall be chargeable against the mental health and mental retardation program of the locality.
Thank you for your prompt attention for all these matters.
I'm not going to be railroaded over a crime I did not commit. The law is the law. Its not to be corrupted and abused or used to cover problems up in clandestine manners.
Sincerely,
Eva Ordo
PO Box 412
Shermansdale, Pa 17090
(717) 622-1518
The form they refused to docket on Friday was docketed Monday morning after I sent them the above email. I was granted a hearing on January 14, 2016 without a public defender which was not my wish or request. At the hearing, Judge Skip Ebert refused to allow me to submit documented evidence and cut my trial short stating he had another hearing. I objected and stated I had evidence to submit and asked for the hearing to be continued to another day. Ebert refused to give me another date for a hearing. He then FORCED a psychiatric evaluation on me within 3-5 minutes of close of the hearing... without a public defender or a psychiatrist which is a violation of my rights. The Department of Welfare quack stated he thought I had Tangential Thinking and I'm sure he pulled some other FALSE diagnoses from that incompetent mind of his. People that have Tangential Thinking can't give straight answers and are in la-la land. IE: Where are you from? Answer: "I have an English Setter! People in England eat fish and chips! Fish have gills. Did you know Gill is short for Gilbert?" This Department of Welfare's psychiatrist is either incredibly incompetent or corrupt.
Judge Ebert stated that I would get a free copy of the hearing's transcripts and I never got them. I got strung along.
I kept calling for transcripts and the transcriber said she had other cases to make copies of because they appealed and were time limited. I finally realized that after 30 days if I had not gotten a copy of my transcripts that I would have to appeal. I called the public defender's office to ask about my mental competency test and Hollinger refused to say anything about it. Instead she told me the "good news" that my charges were dropped! She said they hadn't gotten around to mailing that to me yet. I had no idea why the charges were "dropped" but it put me in a false sense of security. Come Monday I called the Clerk of Courts Office and found out that Judge Ebert filed an Order that I'm INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL and that my case would be Nolle Prosse (Prosqui) which means it wasn't dropped. It means that they aren't persuing the charges because I'm incompetent to stand trial and I was told the document stated that I would not have to pay nothing because I've already paid some money for the damaged door. The landlady kept my $150.00 deposit money and the door damage was worth less than $50! She tried to do insurance fraud by stating the door damage was $1,375.00!!! They HAD NO CASE AGAINST ME!!! I COMMITTED NO CRIME! The cop is on record stating that IF I don't pay the land lady for the door he would file criminal charges against me. This is against the law. If I broke the law...he has to charge me and not wait to extort money out of me by filing criminal charges.
The criminal charges were filed out of malice though and I will post more on that later.
Today, February 16, 2016 I filed the following right before close of court. They did not want to accept my appeal/drop nolle prosse/request for court appointed attorney. I was told I had to file an In Forma Pauperis form which they refused to give me. I've filled one out before and it was denied and I was given one by the Prothonotary Office. I guess the Clerk of Courts, well, never mind. I then asked for a blank sheet of paper and quickly scribbled an In Forma Pauperis request because I only had 2 minutes left before close of court. They kept bickering about if the stuff should be time stamped till it was 4:32pm and Mr. Lebo instructed them to just time stamp it after I stated that I'm more than eligible for In Forma Pauperis and it will be granted for the Appeal to be filed with the Superior Court which they were wanting me to pay for. I also argued that I should have an attorney but since I filed complaints about the public defender's office and the prosecutor that it would be a CONFLICT of INTEREST for my PD to file such paperwork and that I was asking for a Court Appointed Attorney in this filing as well. My stuff finally got stamped/admitted at 4:32 & 4:33pm.
This is what I filed:
COMMONWEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. cp-21-cr-1755-2015
charges (1) CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
EVA ORDO AFFIANT: OFC KEITH STAMBAUGH
OTN: T6498520
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOTICE TO DROP NOLLE PROSSE
NOTICE FOR A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY
EVA ORDO
FILING FOR
INFORMA PAUPERIS
ON APPEAL
TO: CP-21-C-1755-2015
I'M FILING BECAUSE MY PD'S ARE CONFLICT OF INTEREST & I NEED COUNSEL COURT APPOINTED. I ONLY MAKE $742 & 22& 11 A MONTH & QUALIFY FOR IFP.
THANK YOU,
Eva Ordo
BY LAW, IF I DO NOT LIKE THE DEPARTMENT OF WELLFARE'S PSYCHIATRIST'S EVALUATION, I AM ENTITLED TO GET A PSYCHIATRIST OF MY CHOICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE HAS TO PAY FOR THEM! I WAS NOT GIVEN THIS OPTION. MIND YOU...I TOLD THEM WHAT THE LAWS FOR "COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL EVALUATION" ARE. DO NOT CONFUSE THEM WITH "COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS." THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS ;-)
Judge Ebert stated that I would get a free copy of the hearing's transcripts and I never got them. I got strung along.
I kept calling for transcripts and the transcriber said she had other cases to make copies of because they appealed and were time limited. I finally realized that after 30 days if I had not gotten a copy of my transcripts that I would have to appeal. I called the public defender's office to ask about my mental competency test and Hollinger refused to say anything about it. Instead she told me the "good news" that my charges were dropped! She said they hadn't gotten around to mailing that to me yet. I had no idea why the charges were "dropped" but it put me in a false sense of security. Come Monday I called the Clerk of Courts Office and found out that Judge Ebert filed an Order that I'm INCOMPETENT TO STAND TRIAL and that my case would be Nolle Prosse (Prosqui) which means it wasn't dropped. It means that they aren't persuing the charges because I'm incompetent to stand trial and I was told the document stated that I would not have to pay nothing because I've already paid some money for the damaged door. The landlady kept my $150.00 deposit money and the door damage was worth less than $50! She tried to do insurance fraud by stating the door damage was $1,375.00!!! They HAD NO CASE AGAINST ME!!! I COMMITTED NO CRIME! The cop is on record stating that IF I don't pay the land lady for the door he would file criminal charges against me. This is against the law. If I broke the law...he has to charge me and not wait to extort money out of me by filing criminal charges.
The criminal charges were filed out of malice though and I will post more on that later.
Today, February 16, 2016 I filed the following right before close of court. They did not want to accept my appeal/drop nolle prosse/request for court appointed attorney. I was told I had to file an In Forma Pauperis form which they refused to give me. I've filled one out before and it was denied and I was given one by the Prothonotary Office. I guess the Clerk of Courts, well, never mind. I then asked for a blank sheet of paper and quickly scribbled an In Forma Pauperis request because I only had 2 minutes left before close of court. They kept bickering about if the stuff should be time stamped till it was 4:32pm and Mr. Lebo instructed them to just time stamp it after I stated that I'm more than eligible for In Forma Pauperis and it will be granted for the Appeal to be filed with the Superior Court which they were wanting me to pay for. I also argued that I should have an attorney but since I filed complaints about the public defender's office and the prosecutor that it would be a CONFLICT of INTEREST for my PD to file such paperwork and that I was asking for a Court Appointed Attorney in this filing as well. My stuff finally got stamped/admitted at 4:32 & 4:33pm.
This is what I filed:
COMMONWEALTH IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
v. cp-21-cr-1755-2015
charges (1) CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
EVA ORDO AFFIANT: OFC KEITH STAMBAUGH
OTN: T6498520
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOTICE TO DROP NOLLE PROSSE
NOTICE FOR A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY
- On January 14, 2016 Judge Skip Ebert held a hearing over my objection to an Order filed Dec 08, 2015 directing me to be subjected to a Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation.
- This Motion was Maliciously filed by my public Defender Linda Hollinger and is a Fraud Upon the Court.
- I sent the Head Public Defender Michael Halkias, Clerk of Courts Mr. Lebo and Clerk Administrator C an email making them aware of how Mental Health Laws of Pennsylvania handle such a case as the procedures were not being followed.
- I was then granted a hearing to my objection.
- I had requested for a replacement Public Defender prior to the hearing from Hollinger’s supervisor Mr. Halkias both in email format and orally in person and he blew me off.
- I explained to Halkias what the laws were but he ignored them and forced me to represent myself without a public defender.
- My public defender was reported to Halkias for being ineffective because she has never taken the time to talk to me about my case except for at the District Justice Office where she mislead me and caused me to Waive my Preliminary Hearing. Please look at what I wrote on the Preliminary Hearing Waiver.
- My public defender was reported to Halkias for not sending me ANY documents in a timely manner, Mr. Lebo had to send her reminder notices which are in my case files at the Clerk of Courts Office.
- My public defender was reported to Halkias for not sending me any motions or communicating with me about what she was doing.
- My public defender was reported to Halkias for not giving me the bare minimum of counsel and repeatedly filing extensions for the trial stating that I was not ready which is an outright lie. I have NEVER received any motions of extensions or etc and ALL documents were sent LATE and this kept me in a constant state of stress and fear because she was NOT adhering to protocol.
- My public defender was reported to Halkias for purposefully botching my case up and making me look incompetent when in fact it was Halkias who was maliciously ignoring me and my case and then filed that “I” was not helping her after I’ve made REPEATED, NUMEROUS attempts to get an appointment with her to discuss my case.
- My public defender’s supervisor Halkias was made aware that I needed a replacement because of all the reasons above and that her adversarial filing of me being incompetent made her ineligible to be my public defender as it was a CONFLICT OF INTEREST but Halkias blew me off.
- At the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation I was referred to as Pro Se which I was not. The Mental Health Law states that I could appeal on my own. Please read the email submitted below.
- At the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation I had no public defender though I requestedt one from Halkias.
- At the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation I had no charges to object to or witnesses to cross examine.
- At the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation No one testified against me.
- At the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation I was not allowed by Judge Ebert to present documentation as evidence. He stated he had another hearing to go to.
- I objected and stated I had documents to submit and asked for another day to continue the trial which he immediately struck down.
- Judge Ebert erred by ordering the Competency to Stand Trial Evaluation to proceed five minutes after the end of the hearing.
- The psychiatrist was at this hearing and it seems like this was premeditated to get me evaluated without due process.
- By Mental Health Laws should have been given an Order to go through with the evaluation in writing which would have given me a certain amount of days for me to acquire another counsel AND a psychiatrist of my choice to sit in on the evaluation . This was a violation of my rights.
- I have not received any documents since that trial other than an order for the evaluation to proceed(which was already done) several days later.
- I have been told over the phone that my charges were allegedly being dropped by some Nolle Prosse and Mr. Lebo stated that it was regarding my not being competent to stand trial.
- I have a right by law to object to the psychiatrist’s evaluation and have a psychiatrist of my choice which is to be paid for by The Dept. of Public Welfare do a second evaluation.
- I have reported Linda Hollinger and Michael Halkias to the Disciplinary Board to be investigated for their handling my case.
- My case has no merit whatsoever at all and I am being MALICIOUSLY PROSECUTED and this is CRIMINAL both by the DA’s office and the Public Defender’s Office and The Silver Spring Police Department’s Office.
- Since I’ve reported my public defender and her supervisor I am requesting a court appointed attorney outside of your court house.
- I am asking President Judge Guido to look into my case.
- I am asking the Nolle Prosse not go through as I am entitled to an second evaluation.
- I will add addendum’s to this filing.
Eva Ordo
EVA ORDO
FILING FOR
INFORMA PAUPERIS
ON APPEAL
TO: CP-21-C-1755-2015
I'M FILING BECAUSE MY PD'S ARE CONFLICT OF INTEREST & I NEED COUNSEL COURT APPOINTED. I ONLY MAKE $742 & 22& 11 A MONTH & QUALIFY FOR IFP.
THANK YOU,
Eva Ordo
BY LAW, IF I DO NOT LIKE THE DEPARTMENT OF WELLFARE'S PSYCHIATRIST'S EVALUATION, I AM ENTITLED TO GET A PSYCHIATRIST OF MY CHOICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE HAS TO PAY FOR THEM! I WAS NOT GIVEN THIS OPTION. MIND YOU...I TOLD THEM WHAT THE LAWS FOR "COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL EVALUATION" ARE. DO NOT CONFUSE THEM WITH "COMPETENCY EVALUATIONS." THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS ;-)
EMAIL ME AT [email protected] mailto:[email protected]